Xref: utzoo comp.text:2339 comp.std.internat:396 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!alberta!edm!steve From: steve@edm.UUCP (Stephen Samuel) Newsgroups: comp.text,comp.std.internat Subject: Re: All numeric representation of dates Message-ID: <3264@edm.UUCP> Date: 30 Aug 88 06:02:02 GMT References: <187@dcs.UUCP> Organization: Unexsys Systems Inc., Edmonton,AB. Lines: 37 From article <187@dcs.UUCP>, by wnp@dcs.UUCP (Wolf N. Paul): > In article <2882@hubcap.UUCP> billwolf@hubcap.clemson.edu writes: >>From article <1988Aug28.010835.17290@utzoo.uucp>, by henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer): >> Ah, I see... Tell me, do you think your odometer should present >> the last two digits first, then some verbal representation of ... >> If not, then why should a chronometer be any different?? > > Can you read? Henry argued from the FAMILIARITY of the month names versus > numbers. If you can tell me of one place where the scheme you describe is > more FAMILIAR to folks than an all-numeric mileage, then fine. If you can't, > stop using silly, contrived examples. If he is talking of the article I'm thinking of, the guy called the all-numeric representation STUPID (with, I believe, caps). He argued that the ANR is stupid and that other orderings MAKE MORE SENSE, as opposed to being more familiar. to quote: ))> I also question the human engineering of forms that put the year first. ))> .... The most important information should be first. For most ))> uses of dates, that is the day number, followed by the month. One thing I'd like to point out is that, in Canada, we have a problem because there are TWO common methods in use: The Canadian method and the American method. (don't ask which is which..) One goes: mm dd yy the other: dd mm yy It can be reall fun trying to tell the difference between Jan 8/88 (010888 and 1st Aug /88 (010888). At LEAST with the new method, YOU CAN TELL THE (&'$#%!) DIFFERENCE!!!!! (at lest until 2001, that is, and I hope we'll be used to the new method by then) -- ------------- Stephen Samuel (userzxcv@ualtamts.bitnet or alberta!edm!steve) MS-DOS : CPM impersonates UNIX ** OS/2 : IBM impersonates APPLE