Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:3079 comp.unix.microport:1378 news.groups:5213
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ateng!chip
From: chip@ateng.uucp (Chip Salzenberg)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport,news.groups
Subject: Re: I think we have a proposal on our hands (re: intel U**X)
Message-ID: <1988Aug23.120758.9051@ateng.uucp>
Date: 23 Aug 88 16:07:57 GMT
References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: chip@ateng.UUCP (Chip Salzenberg)
Organization: A T Engineering, Tampa, FL
Lines: 14

Listen, folks:  I've changed my mind.  Try this on for size:

	comp.unix.sys5-intel    AT&T Unix System V on Intel processors
	comp.unix.xenix         Microsoft Xenix and derivatives

Current volume does not warrant a '286-'386 split.  So, essentially, I'm
suggesting that we replace comp.unix.microport with comp.unix.sys5-intel.

Let's just do this and get it over with, hmm?
-- 
Chip Salzenberg                <chip@ateng.uu.net> or <uunet!ateng!chip>
A T Engineering                My employer may or may not agree with me.
        You make me wanna break the laws of time and space
                    You make me wanna eat pork