Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!allbery
From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: BSD 9.2 [History of BSD Unix]
Message-ID: <12311@ncoast.UUCP>
Date: 29 Aug 88 21:14:23 GMT
References: <16836@adm.ARPA> <274@umbio.MIAMI.EDU> <3763@omepd> <12285@ncoast.UUCP> <2805@utah-gr.UUCP>
Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery)
Followup-To: comp.unix.wizards
Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh
Lines: 23

As quoted from <2805@utah-gr.UUCP> by donn@utah-gr.UUCP (Donn Seeley):
+---------------
| 	From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery)
| 
| 	...
| 	I have heard that Berkeley is taking the time to divide the BSD
| 	sources into the part that requires an AT&T license and the
| 	part that doesn't.  Which side will the Pascal compiler fall on?
|
| This is one of the few times I've heard anyone express any desire to use
| Berkeley Pascal except as a last resort,
+---------------

You got a better idea?  One that doesn't require us to shell out money we
don't have to buy a commercial Pascal (for a machine that runs an outdated
OS!)?  (Yes, I know about "p2c", but it's not the same thing, really.
Although fancy front-ends might succeed in making it look similar to a real
Pascal compiler.)

++Brandon
-- 
Brandon S. Allbery, uunet!marque!ncoast!allbery			DELPHI: ALLBERY
	    For comp.sources.misc send mail to ncoast!sources-misc