Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!allbery From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: Plan 9? Message-ID: <12312@ncoast.UUCP> Date: 29 Aug 88 21:32:11 GMT References: <846@yunexus.UUCP> <282@umbio.MIAMI.EDU> <24550@bu-cs.BU.EDU> Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) Followup-To: comp.unix.wizards Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh Lines: 32 As quoted from <24550@bu-cs.BU.EDU> by madd@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Jim Frost): +--------------- | In article <282@umbio.MIAMI.EDU> jherr@umbio.MIAMI.EDU (Jack Herrington) writes: | |So how many re-writes of UNIX do we have running right now, let me | |see how many I know of. | [...] | |- Xenix. | | I was under the impression that Xenix was the microsoft port of SysV | to the intel architecture, not a rewrite. +--------------- Wrong. Not only does Xenix exist for the 68000 (Radio Scrap [ ;-) ] Model 16, AKA Tandy 6000) but I've heard that there is a Vax Xenix (though why anyone would want to run Vax Xenix when there are plenty of *real* Unixes to run is beyond me). Also: many (not all, but many) Xenix "System V's" are really Version 7 internally (/etc/ttys instead of /etc/inittab), and *all* Xenix 3's are Version 7 instead of System III. On the other hand, it's *not* a rewrite, either, except insofar as the "fake" System III/V versions have code added that wasn't in the V7 source Microsoft was working from. And the (few?) "real" System V versions are apparently based on Interactive's 386 Unix port. Summary: Xenix is an odd duck. ++Brandon -- Brandon S. Allbery, uunet!marque!ncoast!allbery DELPHI: ALLBERY For comp.sources.misc send mail to ncoast!sources-misc