Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: null pointer problems and AT&T
Message-ID: <8414@smoke.ARPA>
Date: 1 Sep 88 02:13:11 GMT
References: <4964@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> <3395@vpk4.UUCP> <1988Aug19.204836.23395@utzoo.uucp> <3165@homxc.UUCP> <1988Aug26.194505.25724@utzoo.uucp> <8391@smoke.ARPA> <1269@unisoft.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 6

In article <1269@unisoft.UUCP> greywolf@unisoft.UUCP (The Grey Wolf) writes:
>Who was talking about SVID ?  The SVVS is not the same thing as the SVID.

Yes, sorry -- I misread Henry's posting.  I can well believe the SVVS
has null pointer problems, among others.  It certainly is harder to
excuse in the SVVS than in the UNIX System V product.