Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!ttrdc!levy
From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: echoing style - DOS,VMS vs. Unix (was: AT&T Joining OSF)
Message-ID: <2901@ttrdc.UUCP>
Date: 3 Sep 88 21:32:46 GMT
References: <347@spies.UUCP> <670025@hpclscu.HP.COM> <24355@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <8420@smoke.ARPA>
Organization: AT&T, Skokie, IL
Lines: 22

In article <8420@smoke.ARPA>, gwyn@smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) writes:
< Streams started out as "stackable line disciplines".  To replace a line
< discipline, one would pop the old one and push a new one.  Thus, in
< theory streams is a generalization that replaces the old notion of line
< disciplines.  However, for purposes of compatibility, the terminal
< handler streams module may still support the old method internally.
< 
< One might think that each orthogonal terminal handler feature would be
< controlled by a separate streams module, but that's not how it has been
< implemented.  So to change echo behavior you'd have to provide a whole
< alternative terminal handler module.

Or, what about implementing the "better" scheme yourself, and provide, not a
single monolithic replacement terminal handler, but a number of sub-handlers
each of which controls each orthogonal feature etc....

Might this, however, lead to potential performance problems?
-- 
|------------Dan Levy------------|  THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED HEREIN ARE MINE ONLY
| Bell Labs Area 61 (R.I.P., TTY)|  AND ARE NOT TO BE IMPUTED TO AT&T.
|        Skokie, Illinois        | 
|-----Path:  att!ttbcad!levy-----|