Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!nrl-cmf!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: transferring processes under csh
Message-ID: <8436@smoke.ARPA>
Date: 5 Sep 88 03:51:35 GMT
References: <1074@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU> <1264@mcgill-vision.UUCP> <5709@cg-atla.UUCP> <1988Sep1.185005.228@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu> <24748@bu-cs.BU.EDU>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 8

In article <24748@bu-cs.BU.EDU> budd@buita.bu.edu (Phil Budne) writes:
-The wonderful thing about the ITS job (process) interface is that
-processes are manipulated via the file system, each process has a
-unique name and thus you can manipulate any process without regard to
-superior/inferior (parent/child) relationships.

Gee, just like modern UNIX.  I imagine OSF won't pick this up
either, since they didn't seem to see any advantage to STREAMS.