Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix:3098 comp.unix.microport:1392 news.groups:5228
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!vixie
From: vixie@decwrl.dec.com (Paul Vixie)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix,comp.unix.microport,news.groups
Subject: Re: why we have to keep comp.unix.xenix
Summary: ooops, forgot my eyes
Message-ID: <82@volition.dec.com>
Date: 24 Aug 88 17:05:44 GMT
References: <25145@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <465@sp7040.UUCP> <11643@steinmetz.ge.com> <62@volition.dec.com> <109@jetson.UPMA.MD.US> <433@uport.UUCP> <78@volition.dec.com>
Organization: DEC Western Research Lab
Lines: 25

Ooops!

In article <78@volition.dec.com>, I wrote:
# [My proposal,] for the record, is:
# 
# 	comp.unix.sys5.286	(for V/AT and similars)
# 	comp.unix.sys5.386	(for 386/ix and derivatives)
# 	comp.unix.xenix		(for Xenix on all manner of CPUs)
# 	comp.unix.microport	(wait for volume to fall off,
# 				 then delete it.  Post messages
# 				 to it regularly telling of the
# 				 existence of comp.unix.sys5.*  I
# 				 will do this.)

I meant:

 	comp.unix.sys5.i286	(for V/AT and similars)
 	comp.unix.sys5.i386	(for 386/ix and derivatives)

You can't have totally numeric group name components.  All my previous
proposals have had "i"'s, and this one was meant to as well.
-- 
Paul Vixie
Digital Equipment Corporation	Work:  vixie@dec.com	Play:  paul@vixie.UUCP
Western Research Laboratory	 uunet!decwrl!vixie	   uunet!vixie!paul
Palo Alto, California, USA	  +1 415 853 6600	   +1 415 864 7013