Xref: utzoo sci.physics:4270 news.admin:3324
Path: utzoo!attcan!lsuc!ncrcan!ziebmef!jhgr
From: jhgr@ziebmef.uucp (James HG Redekop)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,news.admin
Subject: Re: Is it time for sci.physics.only?
Message-ID: <1988Aug30.173026.4883@ziebmef.uucp>
Date: 30 Aug 88 21:30:23 GMT
References: <1094@sri-arpa.ARPA> <2765@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <1189@anasaz.UUCP> <134@laffu.UUCP> <3732@polya.Stanford.EDU> <641@ncar.ucar.edu> <36701@aero.ARPA>
Reply-To: jhgr@ziebmef.UUCP (James HG Redekop)
Organization: Ziebmef Public Access BBS/Unix
Lines: 11


  Though I'm quite new to the net, and am not familiar with it to any great
extent, it DOES seem odd to me that of the 5 new messages in sci.physics, 
4 of them only mentioned physics, and but one had anything to do with 
physics as physics...
 
  Perhaps, if sci.physics.only is not viable, sci.physics.politics would work?
 
 
    )O+