Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!husc6!rice!titan!phil
From: phil@titan.rice.edu (William LeFebvre)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Subject: Re: 95% vs. 99.9% reliability
Message-ID: <1835@kalliope.rice.edu>
Date: 29 Aug 88 21:54:33 GMT
References: <3763@teklds.TEK.COM> <2087@silver.bacs.indiana.edu> <1704@eneevax.UUCP> <646@a.lanl.gov> <1988Aug9.205520.5911@utzoo.uucp> <579@proxftl.UUCP> <1988Aug19.182401.20602@utzoo.uucp> <1366@eos.UUCP> <13612@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Reply-To: phil@Rice.edu (William LeFebvre)
Organization: Rice University, Houston
Lines: 15

In article <13612@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> link@stew.ssl.berkeley.edu (Richard Link) writes:
>>Well, we can see there's not schedule pressure in this newsgroup.
>
>Yo! Careful with that axe, Eugene!
>
>I live and die according to NASA schedules. We can get our experiments
>delivered on time. You wanna know how many launch dates have slipped?

All of them?  (Okay, so I reused a punch line.)

			William LeFebvre
			Sun-Spots moderator
			Department of Computer Science
			Rice University
			<phil@Rice.edu>