Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!onfcanim!dave From: dave@onfcanim.UUCP (Dave Martindale) Newsgroups: can.general Subject: Re: A golden opportunity Message-ID: <16099@onfcanim.UUCP> Date: 8 Sep 88 20:58:27 GMT References: <1411@maccs.McMaster.CA> <20776@watmath.waterloo.edu> Reply-To: dave@onfcanim.UUCP (Dave Martindale) Distribution: can Organization: National Film Board / Office national du film, Montreal Lines: 33 In article <20776@watmath.waterloo.edu> rbutterworth@watmath.waterloo.edu (Ray Butterworth) writes: > >30 or 40 years ago, Canada had the same golden opportunity >to choose between the higher resolution PAL and the inferior >NTSC. PAL would have forced us to produce Canadian programs >and would have discouraged people from watching the US stations. Radio spectrum is a scarce resource. If we had adopted a standard different from the U.S., we would not have been able to watch their transmitters, but we wouldn't be able to re-use those frequencies for Canadian transmitters either. We wouldn't even be able to agree "you take channel 12 in this are and we won't use it for anything within 100 miles of the border", because PAL channel spacings aren't the same as NTSC either. Spectrum allocation would be real headache. You can build a PAL system that uses the same channel spacings as NTSC, avoiding channel allocation problems, but then you get the same horizontal resolution as NTSC. European PAL gets greater vertical resolution by using 50 Hz instead of 60 Hz vertical sweep, but if you choose 50 Hz in Canada you obsolete all of the existing B&W receivers, plus all of the equipment belonging to the TV stations. If you choose to use a 60 Hz vertical sweep for compatibility with existing Canadian equipment, you end up with exactly the same vertical resolution as NTSC. You can still standardize on PAL colour encoding instead of the NTSC standard, which would make U.S. programs watchable only in B&W in Canada, but there is no resolution difference anymore. There may have been nationalist arguments for choosing an incompatible system, but I find it hard to believe that it would have been a good compromise technically.