Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rutgers!mailrus!utah-gr!utah-cs!sunset.utah.edu!u-dmfloy
From: u-dmfloy%sunset.utah.edu@utah-cs.UUCP (Daniel M Floyd)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: The Ignorant assumption
Message-ID: <5699@utah-cs.UUCP>
Date: 7 Sep 88 07:12:28 GMT
References: <19880820041348.2.NICK@HOWARD-JOHNSONS.LCS.MIT.EDU> <1311@garth.UUCP> <545@cseg.uucp> <1369@garth.UUCP> <707@proxftl.UUCP>
Sender: news@utah-cs.UUCP
Reply-To: u-dmfloy%sunset.utah.edu.UUCP@utah-cs.UUCP (Daniel M Floyd)
Organization: University of Utah, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 14

In article <707@proxftl.UUCP> francis@proxftl.UUCP (Francis H. Yu) writes:
>Christian Bible is a piece of junk. Let's forget it.

What? I missed the premise and supporting evidence for this conclusion.
I think I understand 'Christian Bible' and 'Let's forget it'; however,
the construct 'piece of junk' is too ambiguous to agree with. Is this
literary, historical, scientific, theological, sociological, or some
other junk class refered to?

Furthermore, what is this doing in comp.ai?

*Personal* replies or flames welcome. Let's let comp.ai do it's thing
while we do ours elsewhere. Keep in mind, I have candle snuffers and
a flame thrower of my own. (;<)=