Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!stats.ucl.ac.UK!gordon From: gordon@stats.ucl.ac.UK ("Gordon Joly, Statistics, UCL") Newsgroups: comp.ai.digest Subject: The Uncertainty Principle. Message-ID: <19880915011015.4.NICK@HOWARD-JOHNSONS.LCS.MIT.EDU> Date: 15 Sep 88 01:10:00 GMT Sender: daemon@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 30 Approved: ailist@ai.ai.mit.edu To: AILIST@ai.ai.mit.edu, bph@buengc.bu.edu cc: gordon@cs.ucl.ac.uk Subject: The Uncertainty Principle. Date: Mon, 5 Sep 88 09:38 EDT From: "Gordon Joly, Statistics, UCL" In Vol 8 # 78 Blair Houghton cries out:- > I do wish people would keep *recursion* and *perturbation* straight > and different from the Uncertainty Principle. Perhaps... But what is the *perturbation* in question? "Observation"? Blair also observes > Electrons "know" where they are and where they are going. And I know where I'm coming from too, Man! On page 55 (of the American edition) of "A Brief History of Time", Professor Stephen Hawking says ``The uncertainty principle had profound implications for way in which we view the world... The uncertainty principle signaled an end to Laplace's dream of a theory of science, a model of the universe that could be completely deterministic: one certainly cannot predict future events exactly if one cannot even measure the present state of the universe precisely!'' And what of "chaos"? Gordon Joly.