Xref: utzoo comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:940 news.groups:5328 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!bellcore!tness7!killer!vector!rpp386!pigs!haugj From: haugj@pigs.UUCP (The Beach Bum) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d,news.groups Subject: Re: Call for discussion: comp.sources.archives Message-ID: <392@pigs.UUCP> Date: 6 Sep 88 16:33:06 GMT References: <222@pigs.UUCP> <6031@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> <236@pigs.UUCP> <478@c10sd1.StPaul.NCR Reply-To: haugj@pigs.UUCP (The Beach Bum) Followup-To: news.groups Organization: The Big "D" Home for Wayward Hackers Lines: 17 In article <233@skep2.ATT.COM> wcs@skep2.UUCP (46323-Bill.Stewart.[ho95c],2G218,x0705,) writes: >In any case, we certainly don't need *.archives and *.archives.d. the current reasoning is that comp.archives would be for moderated postings of archive information regarding actual archive sites and their contents and comp.archives.d would be for unmoderated postings. someone has offered to moderate the group and i have yet to receive a response to a letter which was writtem him. if another moderator would like to offer their services, we could get on with the vote. otherwise, i will formally suggest a vote be taken on comp.archives starting the end of this week. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-The Beach Bum at The Big "D" Home for Wayward Hackers-=-=-=-=-=-= Very Long Address: John.F.Haugh@rpp386.dallas.tx.us Very Short Address: jfh@rpp386 "ANSI C: Just say no" -- Me