Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!killer!pollux!dalsqnt!rpp386!pigs!haugj From: haugj@pigs.UUCP (The Beach Bum) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: docs on PK contempt suit Summary: i ain't no attorney ... ... but phil is going to lose this one. Message-ID: <396@pigs.UUCP> Date: 8 Sep 88 15:06:46 GMT References: <5482@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Reply-To: haugj@pigs.UUCP (The Beach Bum) Organization: The Big "D" Home for Wayward Hackers Lines: 27 In article <5482@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> browning@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Craig Browning) writes: >Read the following, the info on the latest outrage by SEA, their contempt >of court effort against PK. A second file details the secret agreement they >signed to settle the lawsuit. Everything after this paragraph was type by >the woman who did the docs for PKARC. i read the entire article, including the examples given from the manual. phil is going to lose, and lose big while he's at it. his trying to slip "ARCing" and "UNarcing" by in the manual was DUMBDUMBDUMB. a similiar case would be if i built a machine and named it the "VAXpc". VAX is a trademark of DEC. [ and if you understand the ramifications of the precedent which was cited in the brief, this is whereon the case hinges, is "ARCing" "similiar" to "ARC". anyone with freshman english behind them should recognize "ARCing" how this word was created. ] obviously there is much popular support behind phil. in the long run both SEA and PKware will lose. the attorneys will have all the money and we will have to find a new standard. the next step for thom to take is to get a restraining order against phil enjoining him from producing any archiving software of any type for some period of time. i expect to see news of that move coming out very soon. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-The Beach Bum at The Big "D" Home for Wayward Hackers-=-=-=-=-=-= Very Long Address: John.F.Haugh@rpp386.dallas.tx.us Very Short Address: jfh@rpp386 "ANSI C: Just say no" -- Me