Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:12643 comp.lang.c++:1609
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!botter!star.cs.vu.nl!maart
From: maart@cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: const comparison in C and C++
Message-ID: <1411@solo3.cs.vu.nl>
Date: 16 Sep 88 17:29:47 GMT
References: <709@paris.ICS.UCI.EDU> <8500@smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: maart@cs.vu.nl (Maarten Litmaath)
Organization: VU Informatica, Amsterdam
Lines: 10

In article <8500@smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) writes:
\Essentially, C++ "const" means "constant"; ANSI C "const" means "readonly".

Aha! That means the following is correct?

const volatile int * const clock;	/* clock is a readonly pointer to */
					/* a readonly and volatile int    */
-- 
    Alles klar,                       |Maarten Litmaath @ Free U Amsterdam:
                   Herr Kommissar?    |maart@cs.vu.nl, mcvax!botter!maart