Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:12411 comp.arch:6288
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rutgers!att!ttrdc!levy
From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.arch
Subject: Re: HP/Rumors
Message-ID: <2921@ttrdc.UUCP>
Date: 8 Sep 88 05:37:41 GMT
References: <580@white.gcm> <2327@mhres.mh.nl>
Organization: AT&T, Skokie, IL
Lines: 17

In article <2327@mhres.mh.nl>, jv@mhres.mh.nl (Johan Vromans) writes:
> A quote from the file etc/MACHINES of the GNU 18.50 distribution:
> 
>   "The [HP9000] series 500 has a seriously incompatible memory architecture
>   "which relocates data in memory during execution of a program,
>   "and support for it would be difficult to implement.

What are the implications of this "relocation of data in memory during
execution" and why would it cause Emacs problems but not problems in
general with C programs which use pointers.  (If the HP9000 will move a
block of memory after a pointer to it has been loaded, then the pointer is
now no good... or is it?)
-- 
|------------Dan Levy------------|  THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED HEREIN ARE MINE ONLY
| Bell Labs Area 61 (R.I.P., TTY)|  AND ARE NOT TO BE IMPUTED TO AT&T.
|        Skokie, Illinois        | 
|-----Path:  att!ttbcad!levy-----|