Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!cs.utexas.edu!pp!catwoman!ables From: ables@catwoman.ACA.MCC.COM (King Ables) Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Subject: Re: Using Sendmail "Oi" configuration option Message-ID: <25@catwoman.ACA.MCC.COM> Date: 8 Sep 88 15:07:15 GMT References: <15805@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> Organization: MCC, Austin, TX Lines: 17 From article <15805@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>, by wales@valeria.cs.ucla.edu: > > It seems, then, that the best thing for us to do is to add an "Oi" line > to our Sendmail configuration file. However, before I go ahead and do > this, I would like to double-check with the net readership in order to > find out whether there are any hidden problems with doing this. For > instance, will "Oi" mess up the "period is EOT" behavior of Berkeley > "mail"? (Or is this done by separate logic in Berkeley "mail" itself?) It's been my experience that many mailers that connect to me depend on being able to end their messages with a . line. In fact, don't most SMTP listeners instruct you to end with a . after the DATA command? I don't think I'd want to use Oi... -king ARPA: ables@mcc.com UUCP: {gatech,nbires,seismo,ucb-vax}!cs.utexas.edu!pp!ables