Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!iuvax!silver!stowe
From: stowe@silver.bacs.indiana.edu (holly)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Prospero Fortran (was Re: Atari fair at Duesseldorf (West Germany)
Message-ID: <2239@silver.bacs.indiana.edu>
Date: 8 Sep 88 20:04:09 GMT
References: <8809061721.AA27884@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <537@nikhefh.hep.nl>
Reply-To: stowe@silver.UUCP (holly)
Organization: Indiana University BACS, Bloomington
Lines: 11


[Someone talks about Prospero horror stories...]

I have Prospero Fortran and have had it since it *was* buggy (version 1.12),
but the latest version (I used to even know the number :-) has been fine.
It uses a GEMbased workbench and has a debugger that comes with it.

I have spoken with a couple of the folks at Prospero's office in Maine (US)
and have felt like they do care.

Sorry, but I have to disagree with you on this one... at least regarding
Fortran.