Xref: utzoo comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d:955 comp.sys.ibm.pc:18831
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!dasys1!tneff
From: tneff@dasys1.UUCP (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: requests to post zoo
Keywords: ZOO COPYRIGHT
Message-ID: <6300@dasys1.UUCP>
Date: 7 Sep 88 14:45:20 GMT
References: <3668@bsu-cs.UUCP> <521@irs3.UUCP> <3757@bsu-cs.UUCP> <522@irs3.UUCP> <3839@bsu-cs.UUCP> <1043@bucket.UUCP> <6263@dasys1.UUCP> <3860@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: tneff@dasys1.UUCP (Tom Neff)
Organization: Independent Users Guild
Lines: 19

In article <3860@bsu-cs.UUCP> dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
>In article <6263@dasys1.UUCP> tneff@dasys1.UUCP (Tom Neff) writes:
>>At bare minimum, the looz extractor must be distributable without
>>restriction or zoo is a dead duck.
>Tom, are you trying to confuse me?  When you run looz it says it is
>public domain.  Its documentation says the same thing.

No confusion intended -- not having a copy of looz handy, I couldn't
remember whether it satisfied what I considered the "bare minimum";
I'm happy to hear it does.  As long as sysops can all have looz on their
boards, they shouldn't mind storing zoo files, which helps establish 
the standard.



-- 
Tom Neff			UUCP: ...!cmcl2!phri!dasys1!tneff
	"None of your toys	CIS: 76556,2536	       MCI: TNEFF
	 will function..."	GEnie: TOMNEFF	       BIX: t.neff (no kidding)