Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!teklds!amadeus.LA.TEK.COM!jamesa From: jamesa@amadeus.LA.TEK.COM (James Akiyama) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Need a 60M to 80M hard disk for a *truck* Message-ID: <3940@teklds.TEK.COM> Date: 8 Sep 88 20:21:10 GMT Sender: nobody@teklds.TEK.COM Reply-To: jamesa@amadeus.LA.TEK.COM (James Akiyama) Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 66 Trying to use a hard disk in a truck would be a very challenging task. There are a few points you'll want to keep in mind. First, the standard shock mounts on a hard disk (the rubber isolator between the hard disk chassis and media chamber) are "tuned" for normal computer environments. This "tuning" involves increasing its resistant to higher frequency (above about 20 Hz) vibration. You will find that these shock mounts generally decrease the hard disk's immunity to lower frequency shock. This is the reason most hard disks come packed in relatively snug fitting containers. These containers are designed to purposely defeat the standard shock mounts. If the standard shock mounts were not disabled, large displacement waves would cause the media platter to "crash" into the chassis as the mounts run into their maximum displacement. The shock energy would then be dissipated in a very short time (at the point of impact) rather than spread out over a longer period. Because of this, it will be necessary to mount the fixed disk in a shock absorbing enclosure. This enclosure should be tuned to dampen low frequency vibrations. The design is a complex interaction between the existing shock mount and mass of the hard disk media chamber, and overall mass of the hard disk (including chassis). Alternately one could design a system where the manufacturer's shock mounts were disabled (or removed). This would void their warranty (although I think your application would void their warranty anyway). This would simplify the design considerably by removing one of the potential resonant sources. You will want to also use a 3 1/2" drive since these tend to offer better shake and shock figures. You would also want to consider using a plated media disk drive. A voice coil system with auto park and auto-lock would help if the drive is powered down while the truck is moving. Be sure the drive does lock--some use a spring tension to pull the heads off the data surfaces. These are much more likely to come out of the parked position under high shock. If the drive will be powered up during this time, a stepper design may be preferred. The "cogging" effects of the stepper will help minimize sideways movement of the head assembly. A voice coil design offers very little resistance to such side-ways movement while powered up. When the system is in place you'll want to monitor the number of times the computer re-calibrates the drive while running. Excessive re-calibration while running is a good sign that the drive is being subject to excessive shock while running. As far as drive recommendations, I would seriously look at the CDC (Control Data Corporation) series of drives. Best would be the CDC "Swift" 80 Meg drive (although I'm not sure its available yet). Unfortunately this drive is not plated media--CDC doesn't use plated media except on their very high capacity drives (> 100 Megs). The drive is voice coil with a very fast (16.5 mS) average access time. Note that the 80 MEG drive is currently the "bottom of the line" in this series of drive (CDC tends to only come out with "high-end" drives--at a price higher than most). CDC also has a well-earned reputation of meeting their specifications in a real-world environment as opposed to many other manufacturers who only meet published specifications in their "laboratory-controlled environment." Hope this helps, and good luck. James E. Akiyama jamesa@amadeus.LA.TEK.COM UUCP: ....!tektronix!amadeus!jamesa ARPA: jamesa%amadeus.LA.TEK.COM@RELAY.CS.NET DISCLAIMER: These view are my own and may not reflect those of Tektronix or and affiliates.