Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:12477 comp.lang.c++:1553 comp.lang.misc:1836 comp.sys.ibm.pc:18969 comp.sys.apple:7392 comp.sys.mac:20185 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bloom-beacon!oberon!eve.usc.edu!mlinar From: mlinar@eve.usc.edu (Mitch Mlinar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.apple,comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Allen Holub on DDJ & C-Chest Keywords: DDJ, C-Chest, final editorial. Message-ID: <12095@oberon.USC.EDU> Date: 10 Sep 88 19:35:51 GMT References: <22873@amdcad.AMD.COM> <636@muffin.cme-durer.ARPA> Sender: news@oberon.USC.EDU Reply-To: mlinar@eve.usc.edu (Mitch Mlinar) Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Lines: 32 In article <636@muffin.cme-durer.ARPA> libes@cme-durer.arpa (Don Libes) writes: >I was quite curious, myself, about this and a friend of mine called >both Holub and the editor of DDJ. Needless to say DDJ told a >completely opposite story than Allen. I'm not going to repeat it. >Don't even mail me. My point is, there are two sides to every story. >Frankly, at this point I don't believe everything that either DDJ and >Holub say. > I agree. But ... >Anyone who read Holub's last column will realize that DDJ would never >print such a thing. Similarly, DDJ will never print their version of >the story, because it would probably sound just as filled with enmity >and twisted truths. Again, I agree that no magazine would print an article like that or a rebuttal to it, either. Their objective is to do this as low key as possible, so as not to offend any readers and keep discussion to a minimum. With this posting, you are actually adding FUEL to this now PUBLIC situtation by saying "I know the OTHER side of the story. But I am not going to tell you, so there." The *logical* thing for you to do would have been to either: (1) post a summary of the DDJ response or (2) never have posted to begin with. Yes, I feel *so* much better now that I know there are two sides to every story. That will certainly be a shock to us dumb net users; combine that with the *actual* rebuttal would certainly give us all coronaries.... -Mitch