Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:12544 comp.lang.c++:1578 comp.lang.misc:1869 comp.sys.ibm.pc:19070 comp.sys.apple:7441 comp.sys.mac:20276 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!pyrdc!pyrnj!rutgers!att!mtunb!dmt From: dmt@mtunb.ATT.COM (Dave Tutelman) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.apple,comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Allen Holub on DDJ & C-Chest (long) Keywords: DDJ, Magazines, usenet Message-ID: <1304@mtunb.ATT.COM> Date: 13 Sep 88 16:59:00 GMT References: <22873@amdcad.AMD.COM> <14047@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <2822@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> Reply-To: dmt@mtunb.UUCP (Dave Tutelman) Organization: AT&T Bell Labs - Lincroft, NJ Lines: 32 In article <2822@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV> rich@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV (Richard Pettit) writes: >In case nobody noticed, you are currently reading the most comprehensive, >open minded, engineer/programmer oriented magazine available in the world. > Right on, Rich! Five or six years ago, when I started reading the net, I fairly quickly let my subscriptions to Byte & TC Tech Journal lapse. I found that I was served better by usenet. (Not necessarily cheaper, either in time or money, but better.) The salient points: - Rumor and news showed up MONTHS earlier on the net than in the magazines. - Of course, there was somewhat more MISinformation on the net than in the magazines, but not by that much. And unlike the magazines, I saw a lot of points of view and could quickly determine what I ought to believe. In the mags, misinformation is gospel, 'cause you only get the one story. - As a responsive medium (query/solution) Byte was months of turnaround and unreliable, PCTJ was virtually nonexistent, and the net was quick and convenient. (Not all queries got responses, but MUCH better than Byte, and much faster.) +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Dave Tutelman | | Physical - AT&T Bell Labs - Lincroft, NJ | | Logical - ...att!mtunb!dmt | | Audible - (201) 576 2442 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+