Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:19202 comp.sys.mac:20392 comp.sys.amiga:22874 comp.sys.atari.st:11401
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cbmvax!rutgers!apple!bloom-beacon!spdcc!eli
From: eli@spdcc.COM (Steve Elias)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: let the Sun shine.  let the Sun shine in!
Message-ID: <1874@spdcc.COM>
Date: 16 Sep 88 01:43:07 GMT
References: <358@island.uu.net> <626@mace.cc.purdue.edu> <68544@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: eli@spdcc.COM (Steve Elias)
Organization: yes
Lines: 21

In article <68544@sun.uucp> cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis) writes:
>In article <626@mace.cc.purdue.edu> mtr@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Miek Rowan) writes:
>>After cleaning up Sun's code, dealing with thier equipment et al ...
>>I would not recommend a Sun to my worst enemy.  They have had some
>>good ideas, but thats about it.  

>*none* of the bugs have your name on them. Do you work for Kirk Smith?

>Anyway, hope you feel better for having said it. Sorry we haven't been
>able to meet your standards. 

	i'm really glad that Sun doesn't meet this weenoid's standards!

	Sun is *very* impressive.  both with regards to current 
	computing industry standards and in historical perspective
	with the DEC of the 70s and earlier.  

	buy their machines and their stock and you won't do wrong!

	(i'm not employed by Sun, but i'll take a spare 386i, if
	 they've got one lying around).