Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!rutgers!gatech!cwjcc!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uwmcsd1!marque!uunet!mcvax!hp4nl!telmail!neabbs!psloot From: psloot@neabbs.UUCP (PAUL SLOOTMAN) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: re: IBM AIX Message-ID: <27260@neabbs.UUCP> Date: 5 Sep 88 16:33:33 GMT Organization: NEABBS multi-line BBS +31-20-717666 (12x), Amsterdam, Holland Lines: 44 >In article <17017@adm.ARPA> mdeleo@lynx.northeastern.edu writes: >>I was wondering if anyone out there has already seen or know something >>worth knowing about IBM's new "UNIX" operating system AIX ??? >>From what I have heard it is suppose to be 99-100% compatable with the >>famed SYSTEM V Unix. But how compatable will it really be ??? > >Well, AIX is and has been out for a couple of years, now. It was >first made for the IBM RT PC by INTERACTIVE Systems Corp. and has >several different versions like the NLS and Kanji products. > >It's very compatible with System V. What else can I say? I protest (partly). I have worked with it for about 2 months off and on; everything I saw _was_ compatible, except for the spooling -- the wonderful lp(1) spooler was not present. Its place was taken by 'print', which does everything a System 34 etc user would expect (menus for pitch, font etc.). However, it only works with IBM hardware (of course :-). For example, cal 1988 | print and cal 1988 > /dev/lp1 do _exactly_ the same thing: both end up in the queue. As a result, output from a wordprocessor (with lots of esc sequences) got treated as a string of ascii chars, and was terminated after 80 - the paper width. For the rest, the system looks fine. > >>Will it work with the "C","Bourne", and "K" shells? > >Yes, we (at INTERACTIVE) had all three shells working on >AIX. I prefer the KSH, so that was there. IBM supports and >provides the Bourne shell, but I'm not sure about the CSH. ... The csh is alive and kicking. (I didn't check for job control, as I don't have it on the other (system V) systems here... Paul Slootman ...!mcvax!neabbs!psloot