Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!mailrus!ames!oliveb!bunker!stpstn!aad
From: aad@stpstn.UUCP (Anthony A. Datri)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Plan 9?
Message-ID: <2074@stpstn.UUCP>
Date: 10 Sep 88 05:24:55 GMT
References: <846@yunexus.UUCP> <282@umbio.MIAMI.EDU> <24550@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <12312@ncoast.UUCP> <2049@stpstn.UUCP> <396@marob.MASA.COM>
Reply-To: aad@stpstn.UUCP (Anthony A. Datri)
Organization: The Stepstone Corporation, Sandy Hook, CT
Lines: 23

In article <396@marob.MASA.COM> daveh@marob.masa.com (Dave Hammond) writes:
>In article <2049@stpstn.UUCP> aad@stpstn.UUCP (Anthony A. Datri) writes:
>>The last time I looked through the maps, I saw a couple
>>PDP-11/70's running "Xenix".
[actually, it was over a year ago when I noticed them]
>You sure that wasn't `Venix' ?  I've worked on several -11's running Venix,
>including 11/23's and 11/73's.
from my current maps:
u.aus.nsw.1:#S	DEC PDP 11/73; SCO Xenix 2.4+
u.swe.1:#S	Plessey 11/23, XENIX-11, V7
u.swe.1:#S	Plessey 11/23, XENIX-11 3.0
u.swe.1:#S	PDP 11/23, XENIX V2.2
u.swe.1:#S	PDP 11/60 Venix/11  (probably others running Venix, too)

So they weren't actually 11/70's, but there *is* an 11/70 in there
that says it's running something called Interactive Systems IS/3, as
well an 11 running RSX.

-- 
@disclaimer(Any concepts or opinions above are entirely mine, not those of my
	    employer, my GIGI, or my 11/34)
beak is								  beak is not
Anthony A. Datri,SysAdmin,StepstoneCorporation,stpstn!aad