Xref: utzoo news.groups:5366 comp.windows.misc:682 comp.sys.ibm.pc:19134
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!peregrine!elroy!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!decwrl!hplabs!hp-sdd!ncr-sd!ncrlnk!ncrwic!encad!enint!blair
From: blair@enint.Wichita.NCR.COM (Brian Lair)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.windows.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Call for discussion: comp.windows.ms
Message-ID: <354@enint.Wichita.NCR.COM>
Date: 14 Sep 88 12:28:17 GMT
References: <17982@mirror.TMC.COM>
Organization: NCR Corporation, Wichita, Kansas
Lines: 18

In article <17982@mirror.TMC.COM>, mguyott@mirror.TMC.COM (Marc Guyott) writes:
> 
> I still like the idea of creating comp.windows.ms for MS Windows and when
> the traffic picks up for OS/2 PM creating comp.windows.pm or comp.windows.os2
> for presenation manager discussions.
> 
> Is there anyone else that feels this way?

I agree.  And this would fit in nicely with the current newsgroup:
    comp.windows.ms    - Windows/286, Windows/386
    comp.windows.pm    - OS/2 Presentations Manager
    comp.windows.misc  - GEM, X-Windows, etc.

-- 
Brian R. Lair            NCR Corporation, E&M Wichita, Advanced Development
 Brian.Lair@Wichita.NCR.COM
 {ece-csc,hubcap,gould,rtech}!ncrcae!ncrwic!Brian.Lair
 {sdcsvax,cbatt,dcdwest,nosc.ARPA,ihnp4}!ncr-sd!ncrwic!Brian.Lair