Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!reading!cf-cm!cybaswan!eederavi From: eederavi@cybaswan.UUCP (Farzin Deravi) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Ontological status of science Message-ID: <94@cybaswan.UUCP> Date: 29 Sep 88 12:50:24 GMT References: <19880820041348.2.NICK@HOWARD-JOHNSONS.LCS.MIT.EDU> <1311@garth.UUCP> <545@cseg.uucp> <343@quintus.UUCP> <1632@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> Reply-To: eederavi@cybaswan.UUCP (Farzin Deravi) Organization: University of Wales at Swansea Lines: 35 In article <1632@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk> gilbert@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Gilbert Cockton) writes: >In article <343@quintus.UUCP> ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe) writes: >>Perhaps Gilbert Cockton could clarify the ontological status of "Science" >> for us (:-). >Could I resist this? No. > >There are two sciences: > > 1) the activity of people who call themselves scientists > 2) the intellectual artefact of philosophers/philosophisers > who have a prescriptive model of certainty which they want > to ascribe to the best practices of 1. > >1 obviously works some of the time. >2 hasn't really got anywhere effective - the great breakthroughs in > knowledge do not appear to be due to a slavish following of text > book method. > >Note that while 1 is generally reasonable and gets on with things, >2 spends a lot of time comparing itself to its neighbours (religion, >intuition etc) and actually influences the politics of research. > The interested reader may wish to refer to the writings of Prof Paul K. Feyerabend: Against Method (1975), Science in a Free Society (1978) and Farewell to Reason (1988). - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Farzin Deravi, | UUCP : ...!ukc!pyr.swan.ac.uk!eederavi| Image Processing Laboratory, | JANET : eederavi@uk.ac.swan.pyr | Electrical Engineering Dept., | voice : +44 792 295583 | University of Wales, | Fax : +44 792 295532 | Swansea, SA2 8PP, U.K. | Telex : 48358 | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -