Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!convex!killer!ames!pacbell!rtech!davek
From: davek@rtech.rtech.com (Dave Kellogg)
Newsgroups: comp.databases
Subject: Re: comp.4gl ????
Message-ID: <2462@rtech.rtech.com>
Date: 30 Sep 88 22:50:54 GMT
References: <2820002@hpausla.HP.COM> <25112@bu-cs.BU.EDU> <6718@dasys1.UUCP>
Reply-To: davek@rtech.UUCP (Dave Kellogg)
Organization: Relational Technology Inc, Alameda CA
Lines: 16

In article <6718@dasys1.UUCP> tbetz@dasys1.UUCP (Tom Betz) writes:
>
>I for one would prefer a comp.databases.4gl newsgroup.
>

This should be quite a bit of fun since we couldn't even reach 
consensus on what a 4GL is!  ;-)

Based on that last debate (please excuse any ignorance on how names 
are usually created), my guess would be that `comp.databases.4gl'
would be a better name than `comp.4gl'  Otherwise, we might 
get postings on SPICE, the various UNIX Shells, etc...


Dave
Relational Technology New York City