Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!yale!bunker!jam From: jam@bunker.UUCP (James A. McFarland) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: Re: MDBS Inc.'s MDBS III post-*relational* ?????? Summary: Definition of "post-relational" in terms of MDBS III Keywords: post-relational, MDBS III, definition Message-ID: <4167@bunker.UUCP> Date: 4 Oct 88 18:41:25 GMT References: <987@mdbs.UUCP> <2452@rtech.rtech.com> <1597@mcgp1.UUCP> Reply-To: jam@bunker.UUCP (James A. McFarland) Followup-To: comp.databases Distribution: na Organization: Bunker Ramo, an Olivetti Company, Shelton, Ct Lines: 46 In article <1597@mcgp1.UUCP> fst@mcgp1.UUCP (Skip Tavakkolian) writes: >In article <2452@rtech.rtech.com>, edg@squid.rtech.com (Ed Goldman) writes: >> In article <987@mdbs.UUCP> kbc@mdbs.UUCP (Kevin Castleberry) writes: >> >MDBS III (a post-relational high performance dbs) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Sheesh, c'mon you you guys. There's nothing relational about MDBS III >[deleted] >> -edg- > >I have had this question for about two years know; > [more desires to know deleted ...] > >Fariborz ``Skip'' Tavakkolian > DISCLAIMER: I am not an expert, and only the source (folks at mdbs) can say for sure. (NOTE: I am not sure why Kevin C. of mdbs technical support [[hi kevin, it's jim from your math class]] has not periodically posted the answer to this question, but currently I think their usenet node is off-line for a short time) As far as I have been able to rationalize it, the term "post-relational" is supposed mean NOT relational. The name is supposed to imply that it is conceptually a successor to relational technology. In other words, "after-relational." An analogy might be: "relational" is to "post-relational" as "3GL" is to "4GL" (be careful here, we are not talking about 3GL's and 4GL's, we are talking about databases) Kevin, if you are out there, please correct or confirm my theories. -jam -- {decvax|yale|philabs}!bunker!jam \ j \ 203/337-1521 \ a \ james mcfarland \ m \ bunker ramo, an olivetti company