Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.modems:2640 comp.mail.uucp:2128 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!uwvax!oddjob!mimsy!chris From: chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: UUCP g stats / baud isnt bps Message-ID: <13924@mimsy.UUCP> Date: 9 Oct 88 18:55:41 GMT References: <183@arnold.UUCP> <1988Sep20.184054.2403@utzoo.uucp> <184@arnold.UUCP> <210@obie.UUCP> Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Coll. Pk., MD 20742 Lines: 51 >>In article <1464@netmbx.UUCP> blume@netmbx.UUCP (Heiko Blume) wrote: >>>as far as i remember the baud rate tells you how many changes of the >>>discrete signal levels are possible. >In article <13842@mimsy.UUCP> I answered: >>Not exactly. `Baud rate' means `number of channel symbols per unit >>time'; multiplying this by `number of bits per channel system' gives >>the more familiar bits per unit time, typically bits per second. In article <210@obie.UUCP> wes@obie.UUCP (Barnacle Wes) replies: >Nope, Heiko was right. Baud refers to the number of state changes the >carrier makes per unit time. How this relates to the bit rate depends >on the modulation scheme you are using (NRZ, NRZ1, diphase, etc.). All three of these definitions are different. While it is not my field, I must say that, from an information-theoretic point of view, my definition makes the most sense to me (no surprise here :-) ). Heiko's definition is `how many changes are possible'; your is `how many are made per time'. It is easy to convert from `possible changes *per* *time*'---which is no doubt what Heiko *meant*---into `amount of information per time', but knowing the actual number of changes (your definition, unless you reword it) tells very little. Imagine a 300 baud FSK modem that is in the spacing state, and remains that way for .02667 seconds. It is making *no* state changes per unit time, yet a machine connected to it infers from this a NUL character---eight bits of information! With my definition, this 300 baud modem is sending 300 channel symbols per second. Each channel symbol is one bit of information. A 1200 `baud' 212A modem sends 600 channel symbols per second, but, since it uses quadrature modulation, carries two bits of information per symbol, for a total of 1200 bits per second. Telebit's DAMQAM sends very few channel symbols per second, but each one carries many bits. There appear to be three orthogonal issues: Imprimus, the number of channels; secundus, the number of channel symbols per unit time per channel; and tertius, the amount of information carried per channel symbol per channel. This is why I like my definition: it fits the situation. (There is, of course, a bias built into this situation!) >... In other words, if you send out an ASCII NUL character, you >will only get two state changes in the entire byte - one for the start >bit, and one for the stop bit. If you are transmitting at 19,200 bps, >this give you an effective baud rate of 3840! Well, that is certainly consistent with your definition of `baud'. Anyone have an official reference handy, so we can find out who is right (and if it is Wes, why the---to me---peculiar definition of `baud')? -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7163) Domain: chris@mimsy.umd.edu Path: uunet!mimsy!chris