Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uflorida!haven!ncifcrf!nlm-mcs!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: malloc vs calloc and invalid pointers
Message-ID: <8635@smoke.ARPA>
Date: 5 Oct 88 05:20:39 GMT
References: <8593@smoke.ARPA> <854@goofy.megatest.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 4

In article <854@goofy.megatest.UUCP> djones@megatest.UUCP (Dave Jones) writes:
>I would prefer that the spec require that the above code be safe.  Does it?

Yes.