Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!mailrus!ukma!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!allbery From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: active rerouting Message-ID: <12659@ncoast.UUCP> Date: 6 Oct 88 23:53:32 GMT References: <4740@b-tech.UUCP> <4747@b-tech.UUCP> <4748@b-tech.UUCP> <6581@chinet.UUCP> <2105@edsews.EDS.COM> <12604@ncoast.UUCP> <290@hal.UUCP> Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery) Followup-To: comp.mail.uucp Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh Lines: 27 As quoted from <290@hal.UUCP> by ane@hal.UUCP (Aydin "Bif" Edguer): +--------------- | Yes. But the proper way to do this is to send to hal!bar.COM!foo. | WHENEVER POSSIBLE, use non-ambiguous paths (only "!"'s or "@"'s, not both). | I promise to correct the problem if it does not attempt delivery to foo@bar.com | when given the path hal!bar.com!foo. (note: I make no guarantees it will | actually get there) +--------------- You will understand that we stopped using this when hal (or was it mandrill?) had a broken sendmail.cf that converted a path that on ncoast was something like "hal!baz.bar.com!foo" into something resembling "baz!foo!bar.com@decvax". (Actually, what was going on was even weirder, but I don't remember it exactly; we switched en masse to mailing through necntc after that.) I can spread the word that it works now, but that wasn't the first time that people here have had problems sending mail through the CWRU mail system; it is to be hoped that it was the last, but "once burned...". (Note: I have restored our sendmail to using "@" "properly", with the restoration of our pathalias database to [partial] functionality.) ++Brandon -- Brandon S. Allbery, uunet!marque!ncoast!allbery DELPHI: ALLBERY For comp.sources.misc send mail to !sources-misc comp.sources.misc is moving off ncoast -- please do NOT send submissions direct "So many articles, so little time...." -- The Line-Eater