Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!uflorida!gatech!udel!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!C7.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU!ralphw
From: ralphw@C7.IUS.CS.CMU.EDU (Ralph Hyre)
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: NeXT fortran?
Message-ID: <3240@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 7 Oct 88 20:35:58 GMT
References: <9291@swan.ulowell.edu> <5022@juniper.uucp> <3520@phri.UUCP>
Sender: netnews@pt.cs.cmu.edu
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 9

In article <3520@phri.UUCP> roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) writes:
>		 unless the NeXT has a good Fortran
>package (i.e. production quality compiler, symbolic debugger of dbxtool or
>better quality, and complete math function library) it's just not
>interesting to us except as a cute toy.
It's probably just unbundled, given the AT&T/Sun propensity for this.
(most of the Unix stuff had to have come from them one of these two sources.) 

BTW, I believe Mathematica is/was written in C.