Xref: utzoo comp.os.vms:9138 comp.os.eunice:67 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cme-durer!paisley From: paisley@cme-durer.ARPA (Scott Paisley) Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.os.eunice Subject: TCP for VMS/Eunice (help!) Keywords: need support Message-ID: <654@web.cme-durer.ARPA> Date: 3 Oct 88 15:34:18 GMT Organization: National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD Lines: 39 We have a vax 785 running VMS 4.7 and Eunice 4.3.1. This critter co-exists on our ethernet here with lots of suns and other ethernet type thingys. We have recently had some problems with the Wollongon's implementation. (mainly old bugs re-occurring in new releases, and lack of help at their end. - so I'm told by the people here who have delt with them.) Our main problem as of late has been this. When we telnet from our suns (OS - Unix) to the Vax (OS VMS) it works fine until you hit a cntl-c or cntl-y. This will lock up the window on the sun completely! This problem occurred after installing a new version of the Wollongon software. We would like to find an alternative. The solution must be able to handle the following: o we would like this solution to run in a cluster environment (on the off chance that this system ever gets upgraded o we would like the solution to be able to use RBMS (DEC's Remote Bridge Management System). I'm told that there is a dec board that will not be supported soon. We don't want to get locked into that one. o works with EUNICE, in some acceptable fashion. I did see one solution here in comp.os.vms that suggested using a microvax running ultrix and using that as a gateway to our existing vax. Anyone have any comments on this idea? Pros/cons? What about Excellan? I know nothing about it. Where can I get info about it? (ie what's their phone number :-) Thanks for all the replies in advance, I'll summerize to the net if other people show interest too. -- Scott Paisley ARPA : paisley@cme-durer.arpa (preferred) BITNET : paisley@cmeamrf "Super Science mingles with the bright stuff of dreams."