Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ames!pasteur!ucbvax!hplabs!hpda!hptsug2!taylor From: Hanly@CCM.UManitoba.CA (Ken Hanly) Newsgroups: comp.society Subject: Business, Defense & AI Message-ID: <571@hptsug2.HP.COM> Date: 5 Oct 88 20:58:19 GMT Sender: taylor@hptsug2.HP.COM Lines: 51 Approved: taylor@hplabs The relationship between computers and `class' is perhaps even more evident in the explicit agendas of important players in the AI game than in the hidden agenda of the pigeonhole principle. Consider the following remark by E. Feigenbaum (Prof. of Computer Science at Stanford) "In Japan, the Fifth Generation Project aims to overtake the American lead in this most important of all modern technologies by establishing a `knowledge industry' in which knowledge will be a salable commodity like food and oil." (UNDERSTANDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, Texas Instruments publishing Dallas, l985, p. v) So much for Unger's comment concerning not considering computers as means for material production. Feigenbaum is concerned that the U.S. meet the Japanese challenge. The development of the field of AI has always been closely intertwined with both business and defense interests. The first computers were designed to serve computational and code cracking needs during the second world war. Even the nutty genius of computing Turing served as part of a team used to crack the German code ENIGMA. In l958 the Defence Advanced Research Projects Assoc. DARPA was set up. Among other things DARPA established the ARPA network so that their researchers could communicate with one another. In l983 DARPA announced a 600 million dollar 5 year program explcitly designed to develop and apply AI technology to military ends including autonomous systems -vehicles that would be able to run themselves, battle management systems, and so forth. The other response of the US to counter Japan's moves involved setting up a consortium of 2l firms to form the Microelectronics and Computer Technology COrp.(MCC) This consortium includes many of the big corporate players in AI including Bell, Boeing,Digital, Kodak, RCA, Sperry. 3 M etc.etc. It is perhaps symptomatic that this group is headed by ADMIRAL Bobby Inman stressing the comfortable linking up of the business and military corporate worlds. Even the beginings of AI reflect the cosy connection between business and AI -and academia and business. The four organisers of the Dartmouth Conference consisted of two people from academia and two from industry and the conference itself was funded by a Rockefeller Foundation grant. In the area of computers and AI in particular the academic pursuit of knowledge for its own sake and a critical understanding of society is becoming more and more subverted, and this occurs often not because of oppressive control by business and/or the military rather it is often through the actions of academics themselves. Prof. Roger Schank was (is?) chairman of Yale's dept. of computer science as well as chairman of the board of an AI company Cognitive Systems. He applauds the idea of the entrepreneurial university where the university becomes linked with outside corporate interests. Ken