Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!cadre!pitt!cisunx!ejkst From: ejkst@cisunx.UUCP (Eric J. Kennedy) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: VLT docs on ucbvax are bad Message-ID: <12898@cisunx.UUCP> Date: 30 Sep 88 14:27:14 GMT References: Reply-To: ejkst@unix.cis.pittsburgh.edu (Eric J. Kennedy) Organization: Univ. of Pittsburgh, Comp & Info Sys Lines: 16 In article wn0e+@andrew.cmu.edu (William Nichols) writes: >BTW I have been using VLT as a terminal on a VAX runder VMS. It has some >problems though when I run applications using the DI3000 graphics package. It >works fine when the di3000 device type is set to tek4010, but when the device I have a graphics program I wrote to address a tek 4106 or 4107 terminal. I have no idea how these relate to the 4010 or 4014 or any other tek terminal. Is one a subset of the other, or are they completely different? Bottom line, will VLT work with this? Thanks, -- ------------ Eric Kennedy ejkst@cisunx.UUCP