Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!bellcore!tness7!tness1!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: comp.sources/binaries groups
Message-ID: <2728@sugar.uu.net>
Date: 2 Oct 88 12:35:55 GMT
References: <1413@ndsuvax.UUCP>
Organization: Sugar Land Unix - Houston, TX
Lines: 24

In article <1413@ndsuvax.UUCP>, ncreed@ndsuvax.UUCP (Walter Reed) writes:
> In the meantime, what are we going to do?  I suggest that we Temporarily
> have sources posted to comp.sys.amiga until the moderated groups are
> back up and running.

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Send stuff to alt.sources.amiga. If it doesn't get to you, I'm sorry. I can't
control that. It will, apparently, get to more people than comp.sources.amiga.
If too much stuff comes in I may have to start posting stuff without test-
compiling it, but I'll try to get it out.

I am no longer willing to moderate comp.sources.amiga full time. Not because
it's too much work, but because after all the acrimony about it I've gone off
the whole thing.

If you really need to get stuff out to many many people, there's still
fishpond!fnf. Or if you need more speed, alt.sources is unmoderated.

But posting code to comp.sys.amiga is a BAD idea. It's even worse than other BAD
ideas like forging postings to comp.sources.amiga.
-- 
		Peter da Silva  `-_-'  peter@sugar.uu.net
		 Have you hugged  U  your wolf today?