Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!gatech!udel!mmdf From: ejkst%cisunx.uucp@UDEL.EDU Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: VLT docs on ucbvax are bad Message-ID: <4396@louie.udel.EDU> Date: 3 Oct 88 22:00:49 GMT Sender: mmdf@udel.EDU Lines: 31 Received: from CUNYVM by CUNYVM.BITNET (Mailer X2.00) with BSMTP id 4734; Fri, 30 Sep 88 19:51:27 EDT Received: from UDEL.EDU by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP R1.1) with TCP; Fri, 30 Sep 88 19:51:24 EDT Received: from Louie.UDEL.EDU by Louie.UDEL.EDU id aa12585; 30 Sep 88 15:12 EDT Received: from USENET by Louie.UDEL.EDU id aa12464; 30 Sep 88 15:07 EDT From: "Eric J. Kennedy" Subject: Re: VLT docs on ucbvax are bad Message-ID: <12898@cisunx.UUCP> Date: 30 Sep 88 14:27:14 GMT Organization: Univ. of Pittsburgh, Comp & Info Sys To: amiga-relay@UDEL.EDU Sender: amiga-relay-request@UDEL.EDU In article wn0e+@andrew.cmu.edu (William Nichols) writes: >BTW I have been using VLT as a terminal on a VAX runder VMS. It has some >problems though when I run applications using the DI3000 graphics package. It >works fine when the di3000 device type is set to tek4010, but when the device I have a graphics program I wrote to address a tek 4106 or 4107 terminal. I have no idea how these relate to the 4010 or 4014 or any other tek terminal. Is one a subset of the other, or are they completely different? Bottom line, will VLT work with this? Thanks, -- ------------ Eric Kennedy ejkst@cisunx.UUCP