Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!uwvax!umn-d-ub!nic.MR.NET!shamash!nis!ems!pwcs!stag!trb
From: trb@stag.UUCP ( Todd Burkey )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: ST Report Vol. II No. 54
Message-ID: <614@stag.UUCP>
Date: 7 Oct 88 11:48:55 GMT
References: <1972@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> <735@auvax.UUCP> <1986@udccvax1.acs.udel.EDU> <495@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM>
Reply-To: trb@stag.UUCP ( Todd Burkey )
Organization: Mindtools ST Access Group, Plymouth, MN
Lines: 20

In article <495@snjsn1.SJ.ATE.SLB.COM> greg%sentry@spar.slb.com (Greg Wageman) writes:
>
>Personally, I feel that if "ApeInc" wants to distribute their magazine
>on the USENET, then *they* should trim the ads, and do so themselves.
>By propagating their newsletter, you are giving them more credence
>than they deserve.  I have read several "issues" now, and it is clear
>that they are expressing lots of personal opinion, with very little
>(if any) independent investigation or research to corroborate.  Much

I agree...plus the tone of their 'publication' has seemed very
anti-Atari, despite the constant pleading for people to quit abusing
Atari. Expressing opinions on the net is OK, even to couch it in the
form of a newsletter is OK, but the ads and some of the articles which
are little more than ads, don't seem appropriate on USENET.  It might
be easier for someone to just summarize the ApeInc info to the Net.
Everything I have read so far could be summarized in one screen of
text...

 -Todd Burkey
  trb@stag.UUCP