Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!convex!killer!ames!mailrus!uflorida!gatech!ulysses!hector!ekrell
From: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: 3B2/300 vs 310
Message-ID: <10674@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: 30 Sep 88 22:37:45 GMT
References: <159@mccc.UUCP> <363@occrsh.ATT.COM> <8721@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <8768@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <10459@netsys.COM>
Sender: netnews@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell)
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 9

In article <10459@netsys.COM> len@netsys.COM (Len Rose) writes:
>Speaking from practical experience I was not able to boot 3.1 on
>a 3B2/300 here.

I've had no problem on my 300 with 3.0 or 3.1 or later minor versions.
    
Eduardo Krell                   AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

UUCP: {att,decvax,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell  Internet: ekrell@ulysses.att.com