Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!convex!killer!ames!mailrus!ukma!rutgers!att!chinet!randy
From: randy@chinet.UUCP (Randy Suess)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: 3B2/300 vs 310
Message-ID: <6703@chinet.UUCP>
Date: 30 Sep 88 23:26:32 GMT
References: <159@mccc.UUCP> <363@occrsh.ATT.COM> <8721@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <8768@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <10459@netsys.COM>
Reply-To: randy@chinet.chi.il.us (Randy Suess)
Distribution: na
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 11

>Speaking from practical experience I was not able to boot 3.1 on
>a 3B2/300 here. It would load fine,but after a few minutes into
>system initialization it would hang..

	chinet used to run on a godawful old 3b2/300, and ran
	3.1 for about 2 months with 2 megs memory.  I have since
	stuck a 310 motherboard in it and 4 megs memory.  Runs
	more like a computer now.....
-- 
Randy Suess                 * But don't underestimate raw, frothing,  *
randy@chinet                * manic hardware.           -barry shein  *