Xref: utzoo rec.humor:15251 comp.os.vms:9132 comp.sys.dec:810 Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sm.unisys.com!psivax!nrcvax!kvc From: kvc@nrcvax.UUCP (Kevin Carosso) Newsgroups: rec.humor,comp.os.vms,comp.sys.dec Subject: Re: DEC Humor and OSF Keywords: (I post here because there is no rec.should.b.funny) Message-ID: <1567@nrcvax.UUCP> Date: 3 Oct 88 00:24:07 GMT References: <799@udiego.UUCP> <96@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu> Reply-To: kvc@minnie.UUCP (Kevin Carosso) Organization: Network Research Corp. Oxnard, CA Lines: 36 In article <96@cwjcc.CWRU.Edu> chet@pirate.CWRU.EDU (Chet Ramey) writes: > >>From the 26 Sept. 1988 `Digital Review' (used w/o permission) > >>CANNES, France -- VMS is more compliant with the spcifications of >>the Open Software Foundation (OSF) than any other operating system >>available today, DEC President Ken Olsen said on the second day of >>the DECworld show, held here. > > >And VMS, with it's peculiar mixture of Bliss and VAX assembly language, is >supposed to port with very little pain to all the machines that the OSF >wants to offer support for? (At least, I would assume, those of the >sponsoring corporations.) C'mon, Ken! Get real! VMS, though it has its >good points, is simply not as portable as a variant of Unix. You are missing the point completely. OSF does not describe an operating system which is to be ported to various hardware flavors. OSF describes a set of standard interfaces which applications use to work with the operating system under which they are running. Whether that operating system be VMS or UNIX or XYZ or whatever makes no difference to OSF or -- and this IS the point -- to the application. Anyone can create the OSF interface layer for whatever OS they choose. DEC will do so for VMS and K.O. says it'll be easy. I don't think that's something we can judge. If you are a hardware vendor and you want an OSF compliant interface to your operating system and you don't already have an operating system, then you'd be a fool to port an OSF compliant VMS to your machine. You're much much more likely to port a UNIX variant along with some portable OSF interface that goes with it. DEC already has VMS, they don't give a damn about porting an operating system, they don't have to, they just need to provide the OSF interface layer. /Kevin Carosso kvc@nrc.com Network Research Co. kvc@ymir.bitnet kvc@nrcvax.uucp