Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!att!whuts!homxb!mr
From: mr@homxb.UUCP (mark)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Microsoft Vs. Borland
Message-ID: <2174@homxb.UUCP>
Date: 29 Sep 88 18:21:52 GMT
References: <876@galaxy> <1133@unccvax.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T
Lines: 20

In article <1133@unccvax.UUCP>, cbenda@unccvax.UUCP (carl m benda) writes:
# In article <876@galaxy>, jshah@andromeda.rutgers.edu.rutgers.edu (Jigish Shah) writes:
# > 
# > does any one have a preference between MS C5.1 and Turbo C 2.0
# 
# 
# 
# Well let me think... which of the above runs under OS/2 and DOS??
# hint, it IS NOT turbo 2.0...

Most often, when I write C code, I write it to compile everywhere;
On UNIX, DOS, OS/2, etc. With any compiler; UNIX cc, tc, msc, etc.
(at least I try for this ideal)

# 
# /Carl
# cbenda@unccvax

mark
homxb!mr