Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!iuvax!pur-ee!pc.ecn.purdue.edu!jmoore
From: jmoore@pc.ecn.purdue.edu (James D Moore)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Microsoft Vs. Borland
Message-ID: <1069@pc.ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: 30 Sep 88 13:14:02 GMT
References: <876@galaxy> <5930019@hpcupt1.HP.COM>
Reply-To: jmoore@pc.ecn.purdue.edu.UUCP (James D Moore)
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Lines: 12

In article <5930019@hpcupt1.HP.COM> andrews@hpcupt1.HP.COM (Edward E. Andrews) writes:
>But can I write WINDOWS applications with Turbo C?

Personaly I do not find WINDOWS (assuming you are speaking of MS stuff) to
be all that great. I vote for Turbo-C. Besides, How much will the WINDOWS
development cost you ? It is not cheap I am sure of that. Borlands products
and support are by far nicer that any MS support I have ever had.

Jim Moore
Purdue University

Of course this is only my oppinion and not that of my employer.