Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:19877 misc.legal:5947
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!hscfvax!pavlov
From: pavlov@hscfvax.harvard.edu (G.Pavlov)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Is ARC a valid trademark?
Message-ID: <627@hscfvax.harvard.edu>
Date: 1 Oct 88 22:36:25 GMT
References: <1682@qiclab.UUCP> <3190@ttidca.TTI.COM> <10117@eddie.MIT.EDU> <30362@bbn.COM>
Organization: Health Sciences Computing Facility, Harvard University
Lines: 13

In article <30362@bbn.COM>, levin@bbn.com (Joel B Levin) writes:
> 
> Other companies' documents always referred to Macintosh as a trademark
> *licensed to* Apple Compter, Inc.
> 
> Apple clearly had to come to some arrangement with the manufacturer of
> high fidelity equipment before they could use "Macintosh" as the name
> of their new computer.

  Actually, they only did so after McIntosh initiated legal action against 
  Apple.
 
  Not that it matters.