Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!seismo!sundc!pitstop!sun!decwrl!labrea!rutgers!att!mtuxo!lzfme!llk
From: llk@lzfme.att.com (L.KELLEY)
Newsgroups: comp.text
Subject: Re: WYSIWYG vs programmed phototypsetti
Summary: Interleaf on the Sun workstation
Message-ID: <914@lzfme.att.com>
Date: 30 Sep 88 15:33:15 GMT
References: <1141@mmm.UUCP> <47700025@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: AT&T, Lincroft NJ
Lines: 12

In article <47700025@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>, mcdonald@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
> >Niether of these are always true.  With the Mac at least, the screen
> >cannot come close to displaying what will go one when you print your
> >document to a laser printer, so WSYWIG is a misnomer.  Also, most Mac
> >processors are so painfully slow at doing anything substantial that it
> >isn't worth bothering.
> 

Have you seen or tried the Interleaf system on a Sun
workstation?  It looks pretty good.

Linda Kelley