Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!bellcore!tness7!texbell!ssbn!carpet!bill
From: bill@carpet.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Microport V/AT DWB 1.0
Keywords: does it work?
Message-ID: <162@carpet.WLK.COM>
Date: 30 Sep 88 03:50:55 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: W.L. Kennedy Jr. & Associates, Pipe Creek, TX
Lines: 9

Some time back I suggested that Microport troff for V/AT doesn't work,
John Sulley said it worked for him to a typesetter.  He also said that
maybe he should bring up JetRoff to confirm or deny the results I saw.
I've seen no further reaction from anyone else or from Microport, is it
reasonable to ASSume that my claim (Microport V/AT troff is brain dead)
is correct?  Has anyone tried JetRoff with Microport's '386 version?
-- 
Bill Kennedy  Internet:  bill@ssbn.WLK.COM
                Usenet:  { killer | att | rutgers | uunet!bigtex }!ssbn!bill