Path: utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!hpda!hpcupt1!vandys
From: vandys@hpcupt1.HP.COM (Andrew Valencia(Seattle))
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport
Subject: Re: Losing interrupts?
Message-ID: <10770002@hpcupt1.HP.COM>
Date: 4 Oct 88 16:26:13 GMT
References: <NELSON.88Sep29160014@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>
Organization: Hewlett Packard, Cupertino
Lines: 17

/ hpcupt1:comp.unix.microport / hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick) / 11:16 am  Oct  3, 1988 /
>But SCO is based on Xenix.  I don't know how much traditional Xenix
>code is present now compared with code from ATT's System V, but at
>least the developers had Xenix available to steal from.

	God, here we go again.  Listen *very carefully*:

1. Old SCO XENIX was weird

2. Current SCO XENIX is a port of System V

3. Current SCO XENIX is still somewhat weird in the name of compatibility

4. Current SCO XENIX will become less weird when the merged port comes out

			'Nuff said.
			Andy