Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!ucsdhub!ucsd!nosc!helios.ee.lbl.gov!lll-tis!ames!killer!vector!rpp386!jfh
From: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: portable way to do nap()
Message-ID: <7548@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US>
Date: 5 Oct 88 04:21:03 GMT
References: <543@mpx1.UUCP> <27909@ccicpg.UUCP> <1988Oct3.230916.995@utzoo.uucp>
Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum)
Organization: River Parishes Programming, Dallas TX
Lines: 17

In article <1988Oct3.230916.995@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
>In article <27909@ccicpg.UUCP> nick@ccicpg.UUCP (Nick Crossley) writes:
>>According to the information given out at the SysVr4 Software Developer
>>Conference, nap will be in V.4.
>
>*Everything* will be in V.4.  :-(

You are all hereby directed to read my old System V flames and the discussions
I've had on the net with Guy Harris.  System V is a pig and should be put on a
diet.

Me?  I'm still holding out for Version 7 on a 386 ;-)
-- 
John F. Haugh II (jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US)                   HASA, "S" Division

      "Why waste negative entropy on comments, when you could use the same
                   entropy to create bugs instead?" -- Steve Elias